linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.9 101/255] wireguard: selftests: check that route_me

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:04:01 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Chen Minqiang <ptpt52@...il.com>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.9 101/255] wireguard: selftests: check that route_me_harder packets use the right sk

From: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com>

[ Upstream commit af8afcf1fdd5f365f70e2386c2d8c7a1abd853d7 ]

If netfilter changes the packet mark, the packet is rerouted. The
ip_route_me_harder family of functions fails to use the right sk, opting
to instead use skb->sk, resulting in a routing loop when used with
tunnels. With the next change fixing this issue in netfilter, test for
the relevant condition inside our test suite, since wireguard was where
the bug was discovered.

Reported-by: Chen Minqiang <ptpt52@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/netns.sh           | 8 ++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/qemu/kernel.config | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/netns.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/netns.sh
index d77f4829f1e07..74c69b75f6f5a 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/netns.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/netns.sh
@@ -316,6 +316,14 @@ pp sleep 3
 n2 ping -W 1 -c 1 192.168.241.1
 n1 wg set wg0 peer "$pub2" persistent-keepalive 0
 
+# Test that sk_bound_dev_if works
+n1 ping -I wg0 -c 1 -W 1 192.168.241.2
+# What about when the mark changes and the packet must be rerouted?
+n1 iptables -t mangle -I OUTPUT -j MARK --set-xmark 1
+n1 ping -c 1 -W 1 192.168.241.2 # First the boring case
+n1 ping -I wg0 -c 1 -W 1 192.168.241.2 # Then the sk_bound_dev_if case
+n1 iptables -t mangle -D OUTPUT -j MARK --set-xmark 1
+
 # Test that onion routing works, even when it loops
 n1 wg set wg0 peer "$pub3" allowed-ips 192.168.242.2/32 endpoint 192.168.241.2:5
 ip1 addr add 192.168.242.1/24 dev wg0
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/qemu/kernel.config b/tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/qemu/kernel.config
index d531de13c95b0..4eecb432a66c1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/qemu/kernel.config
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/qemu/kernel.config
@@ -18,10 +18,12 @@ CONFIG_NF_NAT=y
 CONFIG_NETFILTER_XTABLES=y
 CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_NAT=y
 CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_LENGTH=y
+CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MARK=y
 CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_IPV4=y
 CONFIG_NF_NAT_IPV4=y
 CONFIG_IP_NF_IPTABLES=y
 CONFIG_IP_NF_FILTER=y
+CONFIG_IP_NF_MANGLE=y
 CONFIG_IP_NF_NAT=y
 CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER=y
 CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y
-- 
2.27.0