linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.9 235/255] cpufreq: Introduce governor flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201117122150.375972015@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:06:15 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.9 235/255] cpufreq: Introduce governor flags

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

commit 9a2a9ebc0a758d887ee06e067e9f7f0b36ff7574 upstream.

A new cpufreq governor flag will be added subsequently, so replace
the bool dynamic_switching fleid in struct cpufreq_governor with a
flags field and introduce CPUFREQ_GOV_DYNAMIC_SWITCHING to set for
the "dynamic switching" governors instead of it.

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c          |    2 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h |    2 +-
 include/linux/cpufreq.h            |    9 +++++++--
 kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c   |    2 +-
 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -2233,7 +2233,7 @@ static int cpufreq_init_governor(struct
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/* Platform doesn't want dynamic frequency switching ? */
-	if (policy->governor->dynamic_switching &&
+	if (policy->governor->flags & CPUFREQ_GOV_DYNAMIC_SWITCHING &&
 	    cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_NO_AUTO_DYNAMIC_SWITCHING) {
 		struct cpufreq_governor *gov = cpufreq_fallback_governor();
 
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ void cpufreq_dbs_governor_limits(struct
 #define CPUFREQ_DBS_GOVERNOR_INITIALIZER(_name_)			\
 	{								\
 		.name = _name_,						\
-		.dynamic_switching = true,				\
+		.flags = CPUFREQ_GOV_DYNAMIC_SWITCHING,			\
 		.owner = THIS_MODULE,					\
 		.init = cpufreq_dbs_governor_init,			\
 		.exit = cpufreq_dbs_governor_exit,			\
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -565,12 +565,17 @@ struct cpufreq_governor {
 					 char *buf);
 	int	(*store_setspeed)	(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 					 unsigned int freq);
-	/* For governors which change frequency dynamically by themselves */
-	bool			dynamic_switching;
 	struct list_head	governor_list;
 	struct module		*owner;
+	u8			flags;
 };
 
+/* Governor flags */
+
+/* For governors which change frequency dynamically by themselves */
+#define CPUFREQ_GOV_DYNAMIC_SWITCHING	BIT(0)
+
+
 /* Pass a target to the cpufreq driver */
 unsigned int cpufreq_driver_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 					unsigned int target_freq);
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -896,7 +896,7 @@ static void sugov_limits(struct cpufreq_
 struct cpufreq_governor schedutil_gov = {
 	.name			= "schedutil",
 	.owner			= THIS_MODULE,
-	.dynamic_switching	= true,
+	.flags			= CPUFREQ_GOV_DYNAMIC_SWITCHING,
 	.init			= sugov_init,
 	.exit			= sugov_exit,
 	.start			= sugov_start,