[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201117122146.775521258@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:05:01 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.9 161/255] xfs: fix brainos in the refcount scrubbers rmap fragment processor
From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
[ Upstream commit 54e9b09e153842ab5adb8a460b891e11b39e9c3d ]
Fix some serious WTF in the reference count scrubber's rmap fragment
processing. The code comment says that this loop is supposed to move
all fragment records starting at or before bno onto the worklist, but
there's no obvious reason why nr (the number of items added) should
increment starting from 1, and breaking the loop when we've added the
target number seems dubious since we could have more rmap fragments that
should have been added to the worklist.
This seems to manifest in xfs/411 when adding one to the refcount field.
Fixes: dbde19da9637 ("xfs: cross-reference the rmapbt data with the refcountbt")
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.c
index beaeb6fa31197..dd672e6bbc75c 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.c
@@ -170,7 +170,6 @@ xchk_refcountbt_process_rmap_fragments(
*/
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&worklist);
rbno = NULLAGBLOCK;
- nr = 1;
/* Make sure the fragments actually /are/ in agbno order. */
bno = 0;
@@ -184,15 +183,14 @@ xchk_refcountbt_process_rmap_fragments(
* Find all the rmaps that start at or before the refc extent,
* and put them on the worklist.
*/
+ nr = 0;
list_for_each_entry_safe(frag, n, &refchk->fragments, list) {
- if (frag->rm.rm_startblock > refchk->bno)
- goto done;
+ if (frag->rm.rm_startblock > refchk->bno || nr > target_nr)
+ break;
bno = frag->rm.rm_startblock + frag->rm.rm_blockcount;
if (bno < rbno)
rbno = bno;
list_move_tail(&frag->list, &worklist);
- if (nr == target_nr)
- break;
nr++;
}
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists