[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNN6=5Vy5puLbhOQxSNUNptFA9jKKqnU4RXRcLb4JT=hJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:18:32 +0100
From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
Branislav Rankov <Branislav.Rankov@....com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm v3 17/19] kasan: clean up metadata allocation and usage
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 14:12, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com> wrote:
> > + */
> > *(u8 *)kasan_mem_to_shadow(object) = KASAN_KMALLOC_FREE;
> > +
> > ___cache_free(cache, object, _THIS_IP_);
> >
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SLAB))
> > @@ -168,6 +173,9 @@ void quarantine_put(struct kmem_cache *cache, void *object)
> > struct qlist_head temp = QLIST_INIT;
> > struct kasan_free_meta *meta = kasan_get_free_meta(cache, object);
> >
> > + if (!meta)
> > + return;
>
> Humm... is this possible? If yes, we would be leaking the object here...
> Perhaps BUG_ON with a comment instead.
If this is possible in prod-mode KASAN, a WARN_ON() that returns would be safer.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists