lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:17:24 -0800
From:   Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@...eaurora.org>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        hemantk@...eaurora.org, jhugo@...eaurora.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ath11k@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, kvalo=codeaurora.org@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath11k: use MHI provided APIs to allocate and free MHI
 controller

On 2020-11-16 11:14 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@...eaurora.org> writes:
> 
>> Use MHI provided APIs to allocate and free MHI controller to
>> improve MHI host driver handling.
> 
> How does it improve the handling?
> 
Main reason is we want to ensure the MHI controller is zero-initialized 
and
we want to mandate it as it is better to have it under our control in 
case
we also want to allocate and track peripheral data/memory related to the 
MHI
controller.
>> This also fixes a memory leak as the MHI controller was allocated but
>> never freed.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mhi.c | 7 ++++---
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> For ath11k patches please CC ath11k and linux-wireless lists so that
> patchwork sees it. So you need to resend this.
> 
> Is this a new API? I need to understand if there are any dependencies
> between mhi and ath trees, or if I can apply this directly to my 
> ath.git
> tree.

This one should be dependent on the patch [1] which exists on mainline 
and
should already part of your tree if you're on any 5.10 RC.

[1] 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/bus/mhi?h=v5.10-rc4&id=f42dfbe8f712127031e7b9bc938a1c33cec2ff57

Thanks,
Bhaumik
---
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora 
Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ