[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdmDY=rZDuyjAdXQ9ukms_356mw0wovpxVUJ9Jvz9hEG_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:26:05 -0800
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: Hoist '--orphan-handling' into Kconfig
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 5:54 PM Nathan Chancellor
<natechancellor@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 05:41:58PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:56 AM Nathan Chancellor
> > <natechancellor@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Currently, '--orphan-handling=warn' is spread out across four different
> > > architectures in their respective Makefiles, which makes it a little
> > > unruly to deal with in case it needs to be disabled for a specific
> > > linker version (in this case, ld.lld 10.0.1).
> >
> > Hi Nathan,
> > This patch fails to apply for me via b4 on next-20201116 due to a
> > conflict in arch/Kconfig:1028. Would you mind sending a rebased V2?
>
> Hi Nick,
>
> This series is intended to go into v5.10 so rebasing it against -next
> defeats that; please test it against v5.10-rc4, where it still applies
> cleanly. The conflicts will be handled by other entities (Stephen Rothwell
> and Linus).
Got it. Yeah, applies fine to v5.10-rc4.
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Feel free to carry those with MPE's suggested change added.
>
> If you want to test it against -next, 'git am -3' will allow you to
> easily handle the conflict.
>
> Cheers,
> Nathan
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists