[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdmNW3iynqi_+2c1P-6Prq1a8iVufoaZh2NAbsaBLeZZ4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:28:43 -0800
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Revert "lib: Revert use of fallthrough pseudo-keyword
in lib/"
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 2:16 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
<gustavoars@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> I'm happy to take this series in my tree. I'm planing to send a
> pull-request for -rc5 with more related changes. So, I can include
> this in the same PR.
>
> In the meantime I'll add this to my testing tree, so it can be
> build-tested by the 0-day folks. :)
SGTM, and thank you. I'm sure you saw the existing warning about
indentation. Do we want to modify the revert patch, or put another
patch on top?
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists