[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201117224102.GD524@willie-the-truck>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 22:41:02 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: fix return error code in iommu_probe_device()
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 07:11:28PM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> On 2020/11/17 17:40, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > On 2020/11/17 10:52, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> > > If iommu_group_get() failed, it need return error code
> > > in iommu_probe_device().
> > >
> > > Fixes: cf193888bfbd ("iommu: Move new probe_device path...")
> > > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 4 +++-
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > > index b53446bb8c6b..6f4a32df90f6 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > > @@ -253,8 +253,10 @@ int iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
> > > goto err_out;
> > > group = iommu_group_get(dev);
> > > - if (!group)
> > > + if (!group) {
> > > + ret = -ENODEV;
> >
> > Can you please explain why you use -ENODEV here?
>
> Before 79659190ee97 ("iommu: Don't take group reference in
> iommu_alloc_default_domain()"), in
>
> iommu_alloc_default_domain(), if group is NULL, it will return -ENODEV.
Hmm. While I think the patch is ok, I'm not sure it qualifies as a fix.
Has iommu_probe_device() ever propagated this error? The commit you
identify in the 'Fixes:' tag doesn't seem to change this afaict.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists