[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFBinCCQTTAR9dTpf8pWb4D=+Hc2Tjxj1WE1KYqsyT-S-XPdtA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 23:52:14 +0100
From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To: Yejune Deng <yejune.deng@...il.com>
Cc: kishon@...com, vkoul@...nel.org, khilman@...libre.com,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>, jbrunet@...libre.com,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com,
repk@...plefau.lt, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: amlogic: Replace devm_reset_control_array_get()
Hi Yejune,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 6:58 AM Yejune Deng <yejune.deng@...il.com> wrote:
>
> devm_reset_control_array_get_exclusive() looks more readable
>
> Signed-off-by: Yejune Deng <yejune.deng@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/phy/amlogic/phy-meson-axg-pcie.c | 2 +-
> drivers/phy/amlogic/phy-meson-g12a-usb3-pcie.c | 2 +-
> drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-ee-pwrc.c | 3 +--
> drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-gx-pwrc-vpu.c | 2 +-
what's the reason behind including PHY and SoC driver changes in one patch?
I think both main directories will be applied by different
maintainers, so I believe the patch should be split into:
- one drivers/phy patch
- another drivers/soc patch
Best regards,
Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists