linux-kernel - Re: Ping(3): [PATCH v4] <sys/param.h>: Add nitems()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Nov 2020 23:59:51 +0100
From:   Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@...il.com>
To:     Joseph Myers <joseph@...esourcery.com>
Cc:     libc-alpha@...rceware.org, libc-coord@...ts.openwall.com,
        fweimer@...hat.com, gcc@....gnu.org, ville.voutilainen@...il.com,
        linux-man@...r.kernel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, libstdc++@....gnu.org,
        jwakely@...hat.com, enh@...gle.com
Subject: Re: Ping(3): [PATCH v4] <sys/param.h>: Add nitems()

Hi Joseph,

On 11/17/20 11:44 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> I've asked the WG14 reflector why N2529 (and N2530, though that one's not
> relevant to this feature) doesn't seem to have made it onto a meeting
> agenda yet, when there have been two WG14 meetings since that proposal
was
> made and a third one coming up.
>

Nice!
Please update me on any feedback you receive.

So glibc will basically hold this patch
at least until the WG answers to that, right?

Thanks,

Alex