[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201117234526.GA7807@embeddedor>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:45:26 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Revert "lib: Revert use of fallthrough
pseudo-keyword in lib/"
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 02:28:43PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 2:16 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
> <gustavoars@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > I'm happy to take this series in my tree. I'm planing to send a
> > pull-request for -rc5 with more related changes. So, I can include
> > this in the same PR.
> >
> > In the meantime I'll add this to my testing tree, so it can be
> > build-tested by the 0-day folks. :)
>
> SGTM, and thank you. I'm sure you saw the existing warning about
> indentation. Do we want to modify the revert patch, or put another
> patch on top?
In this case, it'd be much better to modify the revert patch. I also
saw someone made a comment to the first patch of the series. If you
can address both issues and send v2 it'd be great. Anyways, as those
are trivial changes, I already added the series to my testing tree for
0-day build-testing.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists