[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <160558920529.2852.9814496937693880554.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 05:00:05 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...omium.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: bpf__find_by_name[_kind] should use
btf__get_nr_types()
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (refs/heads/master):
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 10:46:35 +0000 you wrote:
> When operating on split BTF, btf__find_by_name[_kind] will not
> iterate over all types since they use btf->nr_types to show
> the number of types to iterate over. For split BTF this is
> the number of types _on top of base BTF_, so it will
> underestimate the number of types to iterate over, especially
> for vmlinux + module BTF, where the latter is much smaller.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next] libbpf: bpf__find_by_name[_kind] should use btf__get_nr_types()
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/de91e631bdc7
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists