[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <194ffa2c-cfc6-29b2-5ee4-3d02581b8e28@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:19:17 +0100
From: Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Deep Shah <sdeep@...are.com>,
"VMware, Inc." <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86/xen: drop USERGS_SYSRET64 paravirt call
On 16.11.20 17:28, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 7:23 AM Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com> wrote:
>>
>> USERGS_SYSRET64 is used to return from a syscall via sysret, but
>> a Xen PV guest will nevertheless use the iret hypercall, as there
>> is no sysret PV hypercall defined.
>>
>> So instead of testing all the prerequisites for doing a sysret and
>> then mangling the stack for Xen PV again for doing an iret just use
>> the iret exit from the beginning.
>>
>> This can easily be done via an ALTERNATIVE like it is done for the
>> sysenter compat case already.
>>
>> While at it remove to stale sysret32 remnants.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
>
> Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
>
> FWIW, you've lost the VGCF_in_syscall optimization. Let me see if I
> can give it back to you better.
Ah, right.
Nevertheless a simple kernel build is about 0.5% faster with this
patch.
Juergen
Download attachment "OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (3092 bytes)
Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature" of type "application/pgp-signature" (496 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists