[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201117112703.GF131917@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:27:03 +0000
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eli Cohen <elic@...dia.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 10/12] vdpa_sim: split vdpasim_virtqueue's iov field
in riov and wiov
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 02:47:10PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> vringh_getdesc_iotlb() manages 2 iovs for writable and readable
> descriptors. This is very useful for the block device, where for
> each request we have both types of descriptor.
>
> Let's split the vdpasim_virtqueue's iov field in riov and wiov
> to use them with vringh_getdesc_iotlb().
Is riov/wiov naming common? VIRTIO uses "in" (device-to-driver) and
"out" (driver-to-device). Using VIRTIO terminology might be clearer.
Stefan
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists