linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 05/11] arm64: errata: Fix handling of 1418040 with late CPU onlining

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201117125725.599833-5-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 17 Nov 2020 07:57:19 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 05/11] arm64: errata: Fix handling of 1418040 with late CPU onlining

From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>

[ Upstream commit f969f03888b9438fdb227b6460d99ede5737326d ]

In a surprising turn of events, it transpires that CPU capabilities
configured as ARM64_CPUCAP_WEAK_LOCAL_CPU_FEATURE are never set as the
result of late-onlining. Therefore our handling of erratum 1418040 does
not get activated if it is not required by any of the boot CPUs, even
though we allow late-onlining of an affected CPU.

In order to get things working again, replace the cpus_have_const_cap()
invocation with an explicit check for the current CPU using
this_cpu_has_cap().

Cc: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201106114952.10032-1-will@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 2 ++
 arch/arm64/kernel/process.c         | 5 ++---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 10d3048dec7c2..ccae05da98a7f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -262,6 +262,8 @@ extern struct arm64_ftr_reg arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0;
 /*
  * CPU feature detected at boot time based on feature of one or more CPUs.
  * All possible conflicts for a late CPU are ignored.
+ * NOTE: this means that a late CPU with the feature will *not* cause the
+ * capability to be advertised by cpus_have_*cap()!
  */
 #define ARM64_CPUCAP_WEAK_LOCAL_CPU_FEATURE		\
 	(ARM64_CPUCAP_SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU		|	\
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
index 10190c4b16dc4..7d7cfa128b71b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
@@ -511,14 +511,13 @@ static void erratum_1418040_thread_switch(struct task_struct *prev,
 	bool prev32, next32;
 	u64 val;
 
-	if (!(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_1418040) &&
-	      cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_1418040)))
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_1418040))
 		return;
 
 	prev32 = is_compat_thread(task_thread_info(prev));
 	next32 = is_compat_thread(task_thread_info(next));
 
-	if (prev32 == next32)
+	if (prev32 == next32 || !this_cpu_has_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_1418040))
 		return;
 
 	val = read_sysreg(cntkctl_el1);
-- 
2.27.0