linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 044/101] s390/smp: move rcu_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201117122115.242580393@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:05:11 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Qian Cai <cai@...hat.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 044/101] s390/smp: move rcu_cpu_starting() earlier

From: Qian Cai <cai@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit de5d9dae150ca1c1b5c7676711a9ca139d1a8dec ]

The call to rcu_cpu_starting() in smp_init_secondary() is not early
enough in the CPU-hotplug onlining process, which results in lockdep
splats as follows:

 WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
 -----------------------------
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3497 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!

 other info that might help us debug this:

 RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
 rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
 no locks held by swapper/1/0.

 Call Trace:
 show_stack+0x158/0x1f0
 dump_stack+0x1f2/0x238
 __lock_acquire+0x2640/0x4dd0
 lock_acquire+0x3a8/0xd08
 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xc0/0xf0
 clockevents_register_device+0xa8/0x528
 init_cpu_timer+0x33e/0x468
 smp_init_secondary+0x11a/0x328
 smp_start_secondary+0x82/0x88

This is avoided by moving the call to rcu_cpu_starting up near the
beginning of the smp_init_secondary() function. Note that the
raw_smp_processor_id() is required in order to avoid calling into
lockdep before RCU has declared the CPU to be watched for readers.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/160223032121.7002.1269740091547117869.tip-bot2@tip-bot2/
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/s390/kernel/smp.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
index 8e31dfd85de32..888f247c9261a 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
@@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ void __init smp_detect_cpus(void)
  */
 static void smp_start_secondary(void *cpuvoid)
 {
-	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+	int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
 
 	S390_lowcore.last_update_clock = get_tod_clock();
 	S390_lowcore.restart_stack = (unsigned long) restart_stack;
@@ -844,6 +844,7 @@ static void smp_start_secondary(void *cpuvoid)
 	set_cpu_flag(CIF_ASCE_PRIMARY);
 	set_cpu_flag(CIF_ASCE_SECONDARY);
 	cpu_init();
+	rcu_cpu_starting(cpu);
 	preempt_disable();
 	init_cpu_timer();
 	vtime_init();
-- 
2.27.0