lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 18 Nov 2020 01:15:31 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@...inx.com>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@...inx.com>,
        sgoud@...inx.com, Robert Hancock <hancock@...systems.ca>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        git@...inx.com
Subject: Re: [LINUX PATCH V3 5/9] gpio: gpio-xilinx: Add interrupt support

Hi Srinivas!

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 6:12 PM Srinivas Neeli
<srinivas.neeli@...inx.com> wrote:

> Adds interrupt support to the Xilinx GPIO driver so that rising and
> falling edge line events can be supported. Since interrupt support is
> an optional feature in the Xilinx IP, the driver continues to support
> devices which have no interrupt provided.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Hancock <hancock@...systems.ca>
> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@...inx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@...inx.com>

(...)
>  config GPIO_XILINX
>         tristate "Xilinx GPIO support"
> +       select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
> +       depends on OF_GPIO
>         help
>           Say yes here to support the Xilinx FPGA GPIO device

Please add:
select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY

Because your driver requires this.

> +       /* Update cells with gpio-cells value */
> +       if (of_property_read_u32(np, "#gpio-cells", &cells))
> +               dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Missing gpio-cells property\n");
(...)
> +       chip->gc.of_gpio_n_cells = cells;

Why is this necessary?
Mention in the commit.

Other than that this looks very good and good use
of the hierarchical IRQ feature in gpiolib!

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ