[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1605671382.23622.8.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:49:42 +0800
From: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com>
To: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>
CC: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 14/24] clk: mediatek: Add MT8192 imp i2c wrapper
clock support
On Wed, 2020-11-18 at 10:41 +0800, Yingjoe Chen wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-11-09 at 10:03 +0800, Weiyi Lu wrote:
> > Add MT8192 imp i2c wrapper clock provider
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/clk/mediatek/Kconfig | 6 ++
> > drivers/clk/mediatek/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8192-imp_iic_wrap.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 126 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8192-imp_iic_wrap.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/mediatek/Kconfig
> > index eb549f8..8acc7d6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/Kconfig
> > @@ -515,6 +515,12 @@ config COMMON_CLK_MT8192_IMGSYS
> > help
> > This driver supports MediaTek MT8192 imgsys and imgsys2 clocks.
> >
> > +config COMMON_CLK_MT8192_IMP_IIC_WRAP
> > + bool "Clock driver for MediaTek MT8192 imp_iic_wrap"
> > + depends on COMMON_CLK_MT8192
> > + help
> > + This driver supports MediaTek MT8192 imp_iic_wrap clocks.
> > +
> > config COMMON_CLK_MT8516
> > bool "Clock driver for MediaTek MT8516"
> > depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK || COMPILE_TEST
>
> <...>
>
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver clk_mt8192_imp_iic_wrap_drv = {
> > + .probe = mtk_clk_simple_probe,
>
> Good to have this generic probe function. Now several mtk clk drivers
> are just a few data.
>
> But this series still add >10 configs for mt8192 clock drivers. Why do
> we need separate configs for clocks of different domain? I don't think
> they need lots of resource. We should review the rationale and reduce
> the numbers.
>
Hi Joe,
Thanks for reviewing.
There have been some discussions in patch[1] as to why the subsystem
clocks are now separated by different configs.
And we do need these clocks to be optional on some MediatTek SoC
platform.
I thought it it now a rationale number of subsystem clock provider
drivers. In this series, we have reduced from 23 to 12.
[1]
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/1460621514-65191-5-git-send-email-jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com/
>
> Joe.C
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists