linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Add kernel-doc test script

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <19ebee73-0e7a-7dc1-5948-072ae153e383@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:21:11 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add kernel-doc test script

On 17/11/20 23:36, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> +# the -man output includes the build date
> +export KBUILD_BUILD_TIMESTAMP=1991-08-25

Nice :)

> +ok=yes
> +
> +# don't even try to test other formats if -none fails:
> +test none -none || exit 1
> +
> +test rst2 -rst -sphinx-version 3.0.0 || ok=no

Do you want 3.0.0 here too?

> +test rst3 -rst -sphinx-version 3.0.0 || ok=no
> +test man -man || ok=no

Also since you are at it you might as well rename the function to 
something other than "test", it's a bit confusing due to the "test" 
shell builtin.

Paolo