[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201118115500.GB4827@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:55:00 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Viorel Suman <viorel.suman@....com>
Cc: "Viorel Suman (OSS)" <viorel.suman@....nxp.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
"S.j. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ASoC: ak4458: use reset control instead of reset gpio
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 06:17:36PM +0000, Viorel Suman wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 12:20:36AM +0200, Viorel Suman (OSS) wrote:
> > One thing I'm not clear on is if there's some way to ensure that we don't have
> > different instances of the device resetting each other without them noticing?
> > Shouldn't be an issue in practice for the use here.
> The way to ensure that we don't have different instances of the device resetting each
> other is to rely on the way the "shared" reset is handled by reset API:
> ==========
> + ak4458->reset = devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared(ak4458->dev, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(ak4458->reset))
> + return PTR_ERR(ak4458->reset);
> ==========
Flip side of that then, how do we know when a reset has actually
happened?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists