[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <90bb063077a7e5a429dfbfc4dd4b6a4d@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:38:26 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] irqchip: ocelot: Add support for Luton platforms
On 2020-11-16 16:24, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> This patch extends irqchip driver for oceleot to be used with an other
> vcoreiii base platform: Luton.
>
> Based on a larger patch from Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-mscc-ocelot.c | 145 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 123 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mscc-ocelot.c
> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mscc-ocelot.c
> index 88143c0b700c..9964800c53c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mscc-ocelot.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mscc-ocelot.c
> @@ -12,39 +12,115 @@
> #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>
> -#define ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_STICKY 0x10
> -#define ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_ENA 0x18
> -#define ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_ENA_CLR 0x1c
> -#define ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_ENA_SET 0x20
> -#define ICPU_CFG_INTR_DST_INTR_IDENT(x) (0x38 + 0x4 * (x))
> -#define ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_TRIGGER(x) (0x5c + 0x4 * (x))
> -
> -#define OCELOT_NR_IRQ 24
> +#define ICPU_CFG_INTR_DST_INTR_IDENT(_p, x) (_p->reg_off_ident + 0x4 *
> (x))
> +#define ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_TRIGGER(_p, x) (_p->reg_off_trigger + 0x4 *
> (x))
> +
> +#define FLAGS_NEED_INIT_ENABLE BIT(0)
> +#define FLAGS_FORCE_LUTON_STYLE BIT(1)
> +#define FLAGS_HAS_TRIGGER BIT(2)
> +
> +struct chip_props {
> + u32 flags;
> + u32 reg_off_sticky;
> + u32 reg_off_ena;
> + u32 reg_off_ena_clr;
> + u32 reg_off_ena_set;
> + u32 reg_off_ident;
> + u32 reg_off_trigger;
> + u32 reg_off_force;
> + u32 reg_off_ena_irq0;
Do all these fields need to be u32s?
> + u32 n_irq;
> +};
> +
> +static const struct chip_props ocelot_props = {
> + .flags = FLAGS_HAS_TRIGGER,
> + .reg_off_sticky = 0x10,
> + .reg_off_ena = 0x18,
> + .reg_off_ena_clr = 0x1c,
> + .reg_off_ena_set = 0x20,
> + .reg_off_ident = 0x38,
> + .reg_off_trigger = 0x5c,
> + .reg_off_force = 0xc,
> + .n_irq = 24,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct chip_props luton_props = {
> + .flags = FLAGS_NEED_INIT_ENABLE |
> + FLAGS_FORCE_LUTON_STYLE,
LUTON_STYLE doesn't quite convey the idea of what this implies.
Please use a name that actually means something (other than the
city north of London). And force what exactly?
> + .reg_off_sticky = 0,
> + .reg_off_ena = 0x4,
> + .reg_off_ena_clr = 0x8,
> + .reg_off_ena_set = 0xc,
> + .reg_off_ident = 0x18,
> + .reg_off_trigger = 0,
If this field doesn't exist (because the matching flag isn't set), don't
list it.
> + .reg_off_force = 0x38,
> + .reg_off_ena_irq0 = 0x14,
> + .n_irq = 28,
> +};
Please split this patch in two: rework the Ocelot driver to the "new"
style in one patch, then introduce new platform in another.
>
> static void ocelot_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
> {
> struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> + struct irq_domain *d = data->domain;
> + struct chip_props *p = d->host_data;
> struct irq_chip_type *ct = irq_data_get_chip_type(data);
> unsigned int mask = data->mask;
> u32 val;
>
> irq_gc_lock(gc);
> - val = irq_reg_readl(gc, ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_TRIGGER(0)) |
> - irq_reg_readl(gc, ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_TRIGGER(1));
> - if (!(val & mask))
> - irq_reg_writel(gc, mask, ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_STICKY);
> + if (p->flags & FLAGS_HAS_TRIGGER) {
> + val = irq_reg_readl(gc, ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_TRIGGER(p, 0)) |
> + irq_reg_readl(gc, ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_TRIGGER(p, 1));
> + if (!(val & mask))
> + irq_reg_writel(gc, mask, p->reg_off_sticky);
> + }
>
> *ct->mask_cache &= ~mask;
> - irq_reg_writel(gc, mask, ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_ENA_SET);
> + irq_reg_writel(gc, mask, p->reg_off_ena_set);
> irq_gc_unlock(gc);
> }
>
> +static void luton_irq_force(struct irq_data *data,
> + struct irq_chip_generic *gc,
> + struct chip_props *p)
> +{
> + int off = p->reg_off_force + (data->hwirq * sizeof(u32));
> + u32 val = irq_reg_readl(gc, off);
> +
> + irq_reg_writel(gc, val | BIT(3), off);
> +}
> +
> +static int ocelot_irq_force(struct irq_data *data,
> + enum irqchip_irq_state which, bool state)
Please use a name that matches the same of the API.
> +{
> + struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> + struct irq_domain *d = data->domain;
> + struct chip_props *p = d->host_data;
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* Only supports triggering */
> + if ((which == IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING ||
> + which == IRQCHIP_STATE_ACTIVE) &&
PENDING and ACTIVE are two very different things, and yet you handle
them the same way. Which one does your interrupt controller support?
> + state && p->reg_off_force) {
> + if (p->flags & FLAGS_FORCE_LUTON_STYLE)
> + /* Config register style */
> + luton_irq_force(data, gc, p);
> + else
> + /* New, bitmask style */
> + irq_reg_writel(gc, data->mask, p->reg_off_force);
> + ret = 0;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static void ocelot_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
> {
> struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> struct irq_domain *d = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> + struct chip_props *p = d->host_data;
> struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(d, 0);
> - u32 reg = irq_reg_readl(gc, ICPU_CFG_INTR_DST_INTR_IDENT(0));
> + u32 reg = irq_reg_readl(gc, ICPU_CFG_INTR_DST_INTR_IDENT(p, 0));
>
> chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
>
> @@ -58,25 +134,28 @@ static void ocelot_irq_handler(struct irq_desc
> *desc)
> chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> }
>
> -static int __init ocelot_irq_init(struct device_node *node,
> - struct device_node *parent)
> +static int __init vcoreiii_irq_init(struct device_node *node,
> + struct device_node *parent,
> + const struct chip_props *p)
> {
> struct irq_domain *domain;
> struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
> int parent_irq, ret;
>
> + pr_info("%s: Load, %d irqs\n", node->name, p->n_irq);
If you must print something, use %pOFn, just like in the rest of the
driver.
> +
> parent_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> if (!parent_irq)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, OCELOT_NR_IRQ,
> + domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, p->n_irq,
> &irq_generic_chip_ops, NULL);
> if (!domain) {
> pr_err("%pOFn: unable to add irq domain\n", node);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> - ret = irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(domain, OCELOT_NR_IRQ, 1,
> + ret = irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(domain, p->n_irq, 1,
> "icpu", handle_level_irq,
> 0, 0, 0);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -92,16 +171,23 @@ static int __init ocelot_irq_init(struct
> device_node *node,
> goto err_gc_free;
> }
>
> - gc->chip_types[0].regs.ack = ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_STICKY;
> - gc->chip_types[0].regs.mask = ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_ENA_CLR;
> + gc->chip_types[0].regs.ack = p->reg_off_sticky;
> + gc->chip_types[0].regs.mask = p->reg_off_ena_clr;
> gc->chip_types[0].chip.irq_ack = irq_gc_ack_set_bit;
> gc->chip_types[0].chip.irq_mask = irq_gc_mask_set_bit;
> gc->chip_types[0].chip.irq_unmask = ocelot_irq_unmask;
> + gc->chip_types[0].chip.irq_unmask = ocelot_irq_unmask;
> + gc->chip_types[0].chip.irq_set_irqchip_state = ocelot_irq_force;
>
> /* Mask and ack all interrupts */
> - irq_reg_writel(gc, 0, ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_ENA);
> - irq_reg_writel(gc, 0xffffffff, ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_STICKY);
> + irq_reg_writel(gc, 0, p->reg_off_ena);
> + irq_reg_writel(gc, 0xffffffff, p->reg_off_sticky);
> +
> + /* Overall init */
> + if (p->flags & FLAGS_NEED_INIT_ENABLE)
> + irq_reg_writel(gc, BIT(0), p->reg_off_ena_irq0);
>
> + domain->host_data = (void *)p;
Useless cast.
> irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(parent_irq, ocelot_irq_handler,
> domain);
>
> @@ -115,4 +201,19 @@ static int __init ocelot_irq_init(struct
> device_node *node,
>
> return ret;
> }
> +
> +static int __init ocelot_irq_init(struct device_node *node,
> + struct device_node *parent)
> +{
> + return vcoreiii_irq_init(node, parent, &ocelot_props);
> +}
> +
> IRQCHIP_DECLARE(ocelot_icpu, "mscc,ocelot-icpu-intr",
> ocelot_irq_init);
> +
> +static int __init luton_irq_init(struct device_node *node,
> + struct device_node *parent)
> +{
> + return vcoreiii_irq_init(node, parent, &luton_props);
> +}
> +
> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(luton_icpu, "mscc,luton-icpu-intr", luton_irq_init);
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists