linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: adc: ad7887: convert dual-channel mode to DT/ACPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+U=DsqF5tu8Be9KXeyCWD2uHvV688Nc3n=z_Xi2J6H6DFJPRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:52:38 +0200
From:   Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@...il.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: adc: ad7887: convert dual-channel mode to DT/ACPI

On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 1:10 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 12:42 PM Jonathan Cameron
> <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:52:52 +0200
> > Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This change converts the configuration of the dual-channel mode from the
> > > old platform-data, to the device_property_present() function, which
> > > supports both device-tree and ACPI configuration setups.
> > >
> > > With this change the old platform_data include of the driver can be
> > > removed.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > I'm a bit in too minds about device_property_present()
> > vs device_property_read_bool() which are the same thing under the hood.
> >
> > Not sure which one conveys the correct semantics here.
> > I don't feel strongly enough about it though to do more than raise
> > eyebrows (i.e. not blocking this series).
>
> The idea as I understand it is that the 'present' can be run against
> any type of property, while 'bool' is specifically for boolean (the
> similarities is a detail of implementation).

Yeah, I'm also not sure which to use here.
I guess I got used to using device_property_present() a bit more.
They're both pretty used around other drivers.
I guess I'll leave it as is for now, unless other complaints.


>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko