| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20201118133756.GK244516@ziepe.ca>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:37:56 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: syzbot <syzbot+1bc48bf7f78253f664a9@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
leon@...nel.org
Cc: dledford@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, parav@...lanox.com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: possible deadlock in _destroy_id
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 03:10:21AM -0800, syzbot wrote:
> HEAD commit: 20529233 Add linux-next specific files for 20201118
> git tree: linux-next
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13093cf2500000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=2c4fb58b6526b3c1
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=1bc48bf7f78253f664a9
> compiler: gcc (GCC) 10.1.0-syz 20200507
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
Oh? Is this because the error injection is too random?
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+1bc48bf7f78253f664a9@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>
> iwpm_register_pid: Unable to send a nlmsg (client = 2)
> infiniband syz1: RDMA CMA: cma_listen_on_dev, error -98
> ============================================
> WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
> 5.10.0-rc4-next-20201118-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
> syz-executor.5/12844 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffffffff8c684748 (lock#6){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cma_release_dev drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c:476 [inline]
> ffffffff8c684748 (lock#6){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: _destroy_id+0x299/0xa00 drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c:1852
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffffffff8c684748 (lock#6){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cma_add_one+0x55c/0xce0 drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c:4902
Leon, this is caused by
commit c80a0c52d85c49a910d0dc0e342e8d8898677dc0
Author: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Date: Wed Nov 4 16:40:07 2020 +0200
RDMA/cma: Add missing error handling of listen_id
Don't silently continue if rdma_listen() fails but destroy previously
created CM_ID and return an error to the caller.
rdma_destroy_id() can't be called while holding the global lock
This is quite hard to fix. I came up with this ugly thing:
>From 8e6568f99fbe4bf734cc4e5dcda987e4ae118bdd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:33:23 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] RDMA/cma: Fix deadlock on &lock in rdma_cma_listen_on_all()
error unwind
rdma_detroy_id() cannot be called under &lock - we must instead keep the
error'd ID around until &lock can be released, then destory it.
This is complicated by the usual way listen IDs are destroyed through
cma_process_remove() which can run at any time and will asynchronously
destroy the same ID.
Remove the ID from visiblity of cma_process_remove() before going down the
destroy path outside the locking.
Fixes: c80a0c52d85c ("RDMA/cma: Add missing error handling of listen_id")
Reported-by: syzbot+1bc48bf7f78253f664a9@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
index 4585f654f88369..c06c87a4dc5e7d 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
@@ -2496,7 +2496,8 @@ static int cma_listen_handler(struct rdma_cm_id *id,
}
static int cma_listen_on_dev(struct rdma_id_private *id_priv,
- struct cma_device *cma_dev)
+ struct cma_device *cma_dev,
+ struct rdma_id_private **to_destroy)
{
struct rdma_id_private *dev_id_priv;
struct net *net = id_priv->id.route.addr.dev_addr.net;
@@ -2504,6 +2505,7 @@ static int cma_listen_on_dev(struct rdma_id_private *id_priv,
lockdep_assert_held(&lock);
+ *to_destroy = NULL;
if (cma_family(id_priv) == AF_IB && !rdma_cap_ib_cm(cma_dev->device, 1))
return 0;
@@ -2518,7 +2520,6 @@ static int cma_listen_on_dev(struct rdma_id_private *id_priv,
rdma_addr_size(cma_src_addr(id_priv)));
_cma_attach_to_dev(dev_id_priv, cma_dev);
- list_add_tail(&dev_id_priv->listen_list, &id_priv->listen_list);
cma_id_get(id_priv);
dev_id_priv->internal_id = 1;
dev_id_priv->afonly = id_priv->afonly;
@@ -2528,25 +2529,31 @@ static int cma_listen_on_dev(struct rdma_id_private *id_priv,
ret = rdma_listen(&dev_id_priv->id, id_priv->backlog);
if (ret)
goto err_listen;
+ list_add_tail(&dev_id_priv->listen_list, &id_priv->listen_list);
return 0;
err_listen:
- list_del(&id_priv->listen_list);
+ /* Caller must destroy this after releasing lock */
+ *to_destroy = dev_id_priv;
dev_warn(&cma_dev->device->dev, "RDMA CMA: %s, error %d\n", __func__, ret);
- rdma_destroy_id(&dev_id_priv->id);
return ret;
}
static int cma_listen_on_all(struct rdma_id_private *id_priv)
{
+ struct rdma_id_private *to_destroy;
struct cma_device *cma_dev;
int ret;
mutex_lock(&lock);
list_add_tail(&id_priv->list, &listen_any_list);
list_for_each_entry(cma_dev, &dev_list, list) {
- ret = cma_listen_on_dev(id_priv, cma_dev);
- if (ret)
+ ret = cma_listen_on_dev(id_priv, cma_dev, &to_destroy);
+ if (ret) {
+ /* Prevent racing with cma_process_remove() */
+ if (to_destroy)
+ list_del_init(&to_destroy->list);
goto err_listen;
+ }
}
mutex_unlock(&lock);
return 0;
@@ -2554,6 +2561,8 @@ static int cma_listen_on_all(struct rdma_id_private *id_priv)
err_listen:
list_del(&id_priv->list);
mutex_unlock(&lock);
+ if (to_destroy)
+ rdma_destroy_id(&to_destroy->id);
return ret;
}
@@ -4855,6 +4864,7 @@ static void cma_process_remove(struct cma_device *cma_dev)
static int cma_add_one(struct ib_device *device)
{
+ struct rdma_id_private *to_destroy;
struct cma_device *cma_dev;
struct rdma_id_private *id_priv;
unsigned int i;
@@ -4902,7 +4912,7 @@ static int cma_add_one(struct ib_device *device)
mutex_lock(&lock);
list_add_tail(&cma_dev->list, &dev_list);
list_for_each_entry(id_priv, &listen_any_list, list) {
- ret = cma_listen_on_dev(id_priv, cma_dev);
+ ret = cma_listen_on_dev(id_priv, cma_dev, &to_destroy);
if (ret)
goto free_listen;
}
@@ -4915,6 +4925,7 @@ static int cma_add_one(struct ib_device *device)
list_del(&cma_dev->list);
mutex_unlock(&lock);
+ /* cma_process_remove() will delete to_destroy */
cma_process_remove(cma_dev);
kfree(cma_dev->default_roce_tos);
free_gid_type:
--
2.29.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists