linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 8/8] rpmsg: Turn name service into a stand alone driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANLsYkzeEp5h_3ObJCHaa_g8snRQ17_BFNA3Am-zjM7PExgu=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:16:16 -0700
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To:     Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>,
        "ohad@...ery.com" <ohad@...ery.com>,
        "bjorn.andersson@...aro.org" <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        "linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/8] rpmsg: Turn name service into a stand alone driver

On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 00:08, Guennadi Liakhovetski
<guennadi.liakhovetski@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 05:06:47PM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > I confirm that all this is working as expected - I will send a new revision of
> > this set tomorrow afternoon.
> >
> > Guennadi, can I add a Co-developed-by and Signed-off-by with your name on the
> > patch?
>
> You can add the "Co-developed-by" tag, sure, if you like. As for the SOB: I'm
> not sure if this is a proper use of it? AFAIK SOB is used when that person
> "transmitted" the patch, e.g. if they developed and submitted it to a list,
> or if they received it from someone and forwarded it upstream (maintainer
> case). I'm not sure about this case, but well, feel free, don't think we'd
> be violating anything since I did send versions of code, similar to parts of
> that, some with my SOF, so, should be fine.
>

If a Co-developed-by is present, a SOB _has_ to be present as well.

> Thanks
> Guennadi