[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6e5f8508-3781-a747-acc2-e627f35bf0e8@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 13:28:33 +0800
From: JC Kuo <jckuo@...dia.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
<kishon@...com>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <nkristam@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/16] dt-bindings: phy: tegra-xusb: Add nvidia,pmc
prop
On 11/14/20 12:20 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 04:40:46PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 09:07:20PM +0800, JC Kuo wrote:
>>> This commit describes the "nvidia,pmc" property for Tegra210 tegra-xusb
>>> PHY driver. It is a phandle and specifier referring to the Tegra210
>>> pmc@...0e400 node.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: JC Kuo <jckuo@...dia.com>
>>> ---
>>> v4:
>>> new change to document "nvidia,pmc" prop
>>>
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/phy/nvidia,tegra124-xusb-padctl.txt | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/nvidia,tegra124-xusb-padctl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/nvidia,tegra124-xusb-padctl.txt
>>> index 38c5fa21f435..ea559baeb546 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/nvidia,tegra124-xusb-padctl.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/nvidia,tegra124-xusb-padctl.txt
>>> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ For Tegra210:
>>> - avdd-pll-uerefe-supply: PLLE reference PLL power supply. Must supply 1.05 V.
>>> - dvdd-pex-pll-supply: PCIe/USB3 PLL power supply. Must supply 1.05 V.
>>> - hvdd-pex-pll-e-supply: High-voltage PLLE power supply. Must supply 1.8 V.
>>> +- nvidia,pmc: phandle and specifier referring to the Tegra210 pmc@...0e400 node.
>>
>> 'Tegra210 pmc@...0e400' is kind of specific. Going to update this for
>> every address and chip?
>>
>> If there's only one PMC, you can just find the compatible PMC node. Then
>> you don't need a DT update.
>
> I did advise against doing the lookup by compatible string because I
> think it has a couple of downsides. On one hand it's going to create an
> additional maintenance burden on the XUSB pad controller driver because
> the PMC is usually not compatible between SoC versions, so for every new
> SoC generation we'll have to add the PMC compatible string to the XUSB
> pad controller driver.
>
> On the other hand, this is new functionality and we can easily gate that
> on the existence of this phandle, so it doesn't impact DT backwards
> compatibility. That also has the advantage of explicitly listing the
> dependency between the PMC and the XUSB pad controller in DT, so if we
> ever do get around to come up with an even better mechanism to resolve
> these dependencies than deferred probe, we do have the data already
> available.
>
> Thierry
>
Hi Thierry,
Thanks for the ideas. I will stay with the adding "nvidia,pmc" phandle property
implementation. As for the DT document change, I will modify it with below.
nvidia,pmc: phandle and specifier referring to the Tegra210 PMC node.
Thanks,
JC
Powered by blists - more mailing lists