[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <8F545EB3-9AA4-45AE-84D2-7C0B5CF43FF6@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:52:10 -0800
From: Saeed Mirzamohammadi <saeed.mirzamohammadi@...cle.com>
To: Kairui Song <kasong@...hat.com>
Cc: John Donnelly <john.p.donnelly@...cle.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Diego Elio Pettenò <flameeyes@...meeyes.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] kernel/crash_core.c - Add crashkernel=auto for x86
and ARM
Hi,
[I’m resending this email as it failed to be sent to certain emails.]
> And I think crashkernel=auto could be used as an indicator that user
> want the kernel to control the crashkernel size, so some further work
> could be done to adjust the crashkernel more accordingly. eg. when
> memory encryption is enabled, increase the crashkernel value for the
> auto estimation, as it's known to consume more crashkernel memory.
>
Thanks for the suggestion! I tried to keep it simple and leave it to the user to change Kconfig in case a different range is needed. Based on experience, these ranges work well for most of the regular cases.
>
> But why not make it arch-independent? This crashkernel=auto idea
> should simply work with every arch.
Thanks! I’ll be making it arch-independent in the v2 patch.
>
> I think this rounding may be better moved to the arch specified part
> where parse_crashkernel is called?
Thanks for the suggestion. Could you please elaborate why do we need to do that?
Thanks,
Saeed
Powered by blists - more mailing lists