linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 07/17] PM / devfreq: tegra30: Support interconnect and OPPs from device-tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <150be162-cb1a-4e30-8937-e99cd1c4255b@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 20 Nov 2020 00:04:11 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        Mikko Perttunen <cyndis@...si.fi>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
        Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@...il.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 07/17] PM / devfreq: tegra30: Support interconnect and
 OPPs from device-tree

18.11.2020 07:21, Viresh Kumar пишет:
...
>>>> +	/* legacy device-trees don't have OPP table and must be updated */
>>>> +	if (!device_property_present(&pdev->dev, "operating-points-v2")) {
>>>> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>>>> +			"OPP table not found, please update your device tree\n");
>>>> +		return -ENODEV;
>>>> +	}
>>>> +
>>>
>>> You forgot to remove this ?
>>
>> Yes, good catch. I'm planning to replace this code with a common helper
>> sometime soon, so if there won't be another reasons to make a new
>> revision, then I'd prefer to keep it as-is for now.
> 
> You should just replace this patch only with a version of V9.1 and you
> aren't really required to resend the whole series. And you should fix
> it before it gets merged. This isn't a formatting issue which we just
> let through. I trust you when you say that you will fix it, but this
> must be fixed now.
> 

Should be easier to resend it all. I'll update it over the weekend, thanks.