lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 19 Nov 2020 13:14:02 -0800
From:   Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] bpf: preload: Fix build error when O= is set

On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 12:50 AM David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> If BPF_PRELOAD is enabled, and an out-of-tree build is requested with
> make O=<path>, compilation seems to fail with:
>
> tools/scripts/Makefile.include:4: *** O=.kunit does not exist.  Stop.
> make[4]: *** [../kernel/bpf/preload/Makefile:8: kernel/bpf/preload/libbpf.a] Error 2
> make[3]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:500: kernel/bpf/preload] Error 2
> make[2]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:500: kernel/bpf] Error 2
> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make[1]: *** [.../Makefile:1799: kernel] Error 2
> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make: *** [Makefile:185: __sub-make] Error 2
>
> By the looks of things, this is because the (relative path) O= passed on
> the command line is being passed to the libbpf Makefile, which then
> can't find the directory. Given OUTPUT= is being passed anyway, we can
> work around this by explicitly setting an empty O=, which will be
> ignored in favour of OUTPUT= in tools/scripts/Makefile.include.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>

Seems sensible to me. I have no strong feeling as to whether we just
turn this off on UML or whether we do the fix you proposed here
though. Nevertheless, I would like to see *some* fix go in before
v5.10 is released.

Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ