lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 19 Nov 2020 11:16:04 +0200
From:   Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@...il.com>
To:     Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        Mateusz Jurczyk <mjurczyk@...gle.com>,
        Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mm: Optional full ASLR for mmap() and mremap()

On 19.11.2020 0.42, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 5:55 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 06:05:18PM +0200, Topi Miettinen wrote:
>>> Writing a new value of 3 to /proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space
>>> enables full randomization of memory mappings created with mmap(NULL,
>>> ...). With 2, the base of the VMA used for such mappings is random,
>>> but the mappings are created in predictable places within the VMA and
>>> in sequential order. With 3, new VMAs are created to fully randomize
>>> the mappings. Also mremap(..., MREMAP_MAYMOVE) will move the mappings
>>> even if not necessary.
>>
>> Is this worth it?
>>
>> https://www.ndss-symposium.org/ndss2017/ndss-2017-programme/aslrcache-practical-cache-attacks-mmu/
> 
> Yeah, against local attacks (including from JavaScript), ASLR isn't
> very robust; but it should still help against true remote attacks
> (modulo crazyness like NetSpectre).
> 
> E.g. Mateusz Jurczyk's remote Samsung phone exploit via MMS messages
> (https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2020/08/mms-exploit-part-5-defeating-aslr-getting-rce.html)
> would've probably been quite a bit harder to pull off if he hadn't
> been able to rely on having all those memory mappings sandwiched
> together.

Compiling the system with -mcmodel=large should also help, since then 
even within one library, the address space layout of various segments 
(text, data, rodata) could be randomized individually and then finding 
the XOM wouldn't aid in finding the other segments. But this model isn't 
so well supported yet (GCC: 
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/AArch64-Options.html, not sure about 
LLVM).

-Topi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ