[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <160577970455.11244.7243891330140821350.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 09:55:04 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: sched/urgent] sched: Fix rq->nr_iowait ordering
The following commit has been merged into the sched/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: ec618b84f6e15281cc3660664d34cd0dd2f2579e
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/ec618b84f6e15281cc3660664d34cd0dd2f2579e
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
AuthorDate: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 13:50:42 +02:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CommitterDate: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 13:15:28 +01:00
sched: Fix rq->nr_iowait ordering
schedule() ttwu()
deactivate_task(); if (p->on_rq && ...) // false
atomic_dec(&task_rq(p)->nr_iowait);
if (prev->in_iowait)
atomic_inc(&rq->nr_iowait);
Allows nr_iowait to be decremented before it gets incremented,
resulting in more dodgy IO-wait numbers than usual.
Note that because we can now do ttwu_queue_wakelist() before
p->on_cpu==0, we lose the natural ordering and have to further delay
the decrement.
Fixes: c6e7bd7afaeb ("sched/core: Optimize ttwu() spinning on p->on_cpu")
Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201117093829.GD3121429@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index d2003a7..9f0ebfb 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2501,7 +2501,12 @@ ttwu_do_activate(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_flags,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
if (wake_flags & WF_MIGRATED)
en_flags |= ENQUEUE_MIGRATED;
+ else
#endif
+ if (p->in_iowait) {
+ delayacct_blkio_end(p);
+ atomic_dec(&task_rq(p)->nr_iowait);
+ }
activate_task(rq, p, en_flags);
ttwu_do_wakeup(rq, p, wake_flags, rf);
@@ -2888,11 +2893,6 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)
if (READ_ONCE(p->on_rq) && ttwu_runnable(p, wake_flags))
goto unlock;
- if (p->in_iowait) {
- delayacct_blkio_end(p);
- atomic_dec(&task_rq(p)->nr_iowait);
- }
-
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
* Ensure we load p->on_cpu _after_ p->on_rq, otherwise it would be
@@ -2963,6 +2963,11 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)
cpu = select_task_rq(p, p->wake_cpu, SD_BALANCE_WAKE, wake_flags);
if (task_cpu(p) != cpu) {
+ if (p->in_iowait) {
+ delayacct_blkio_end(p);
+ atomic_dec(&task_rq(p)->nr_iowait);
+ }
+
wake_flags |= WF_MIGRATED;
psi_ttwu_dequeue(p);
set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists