| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4a660207-a67e-87a9-d422-cec497a9c245@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 19:41:31 +0800
From: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...el.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Jiang Biao <benbjiang@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4] sched/fair: select idle cpu from idle cpumask for
task wakeup
On 2020/11/19 16:19, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 02:34, Li, Aubrey <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Vincent,
>>
>> On 2020/11/18 21:36, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 04:48, Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...el.com>
>>>>
>>>> Add idle cpumask to track idle cpus in sched domain. When a CPU
>>>> enters idle, if the idle driver indicates to stop tick, this CPU
>>>> is set in the idle cpumask to be a wakeup target. And if the CPU
>>>> is not in idle, the CPU is cleared in idle cpumask during scheduler
>>>> tick to ratelimit idle cpumask update.
>>>>
>>>> When a task wakes up to select an idle cpu, scanning idle cpumask
>>>> has low cost than scanning all the cpus in last level cache domain,
>>>> especially when the system is heavily loaded.
>>>>
>>>> Benchmarks were tested on a x86 4 socket system with 24 cores per
>>>> socket and 2 hyperthreads per core, total 192 CPUs. Hackbench and
>>>> schbench have no notable change, uperf has:
>>>>
>>>> uperf throughput: netperf workload, tcp_nodelay, r/w size = 90
>>>>
>>>> threads baseline-avg %std patch-avg %std
>>>> 96 1 0.83 1.23 3.27
>>>> 144 1 1.03 1.67 2.67
>>>> 192 1 0.69 1.81 3.59
>>>> 240 1 2.84 1.51 2.67
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
>>>> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
>>>> Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
>>>> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
>>>> Cc: Jiang Biao <benbjiang@...il.com>
>>>> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> include/linux/sched/topology.h | 13 +++++++++
>>>> kernel/sched/core.c | 2 ++
>>>> kernel/sched/fair.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>> kernel/sched/idle.c | 7 +++--
>>>> kernel/sched/sched.h | 2 ++
>>>> kernel/sched/topology.c | 3 +-
>>>> 6 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/sched/topology.h b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
>>>> index 820511289857..b47b85163607 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/sched/topology.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
>>>> @@ -65,8 +65,21 @@ struct sched_domain_shared {
>>>> atomic_t ref;
>>>> atomic_t nr_busy_cpus;
>>>> int has_idle_cores;
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Span of all idle CPUs in this domain.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * NOTE: this field is variable length. (Allocated dynamically
>>>> + * by attaching extra space to the end of the structure,
>>>> + * depending on how many CPUs the kernel has booted up with)
>>>> + */
>>>> + unsigned long idle_cpus_span[];
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> +static inline struct cpumask *sds_idle_cpus(struct sched_domain_shared *sds)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return to_cpumask(sds->idle_cpus_span);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> struct sched_domain {
>>>> /* These fields must be setup */
>>>> struct sched_domain __rcu *parent; /* top domain must be null terminated */
>>>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
>>>> index b1e0da56abca..c86ae0495163 100644
>>>> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
>>>> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
>>>> @@ -3994,6 +3994,7 @@ void scheduler_tick(void)
>>>> rq_lock(rq, &rf);
>>>>
>>>> update_rq_clock(rq);
>>>> + update_idle_cpumask(rq, false);
>>>> thermal_pressure = arch_scale_thermal_pressure(cpu_of(rq));
>>>> update_thermal_load_avg(rq_clock_thermal(rq), rq, thermal_pressure);
>>>> curr->sched_class->task_tick(rq, curr, 0);
>>>> @@ -7192,6 +7193,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
>>>> rq_csd_init(rq, &rq->nohz_csd, nohz_csd_func);
>>>> #endif
>>>> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>>>> + rq->last_idle_state = 1;
>>>> hrtick_rq_init(rq);
>>>> atomic_set(&rq->nr_iowait, 0);
>>>> }
>>>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>>> index 48a6d442b444..d67fba5e406b 100644
>>>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>>> @@ -6145,7 +6145,12 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
>>>>
>>>> time = cpu_clock(this);
>>>>
>>>> - cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), p->cpus_ptr);
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * sched_domain_shared is set only at shared cache level,
>>>> + * this works only because select_idle_cpu is called with
>>>> + * sd_llc.
>>>> + */
>>>> + cpumask_and(cpus, sds_idle_cpus(sd->shared), p->cpus_ptr);
>>>>
>>>> for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target) {
>>>> if (!--nr)
>>>> @@ -6807,6 +6812,51 @@ balance_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
>>>> }
>>>> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>>>>
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Update cpu idle state and record this information
>>>> + * in sd_llc_shared->idle_cpus_span.
>>>> + */
>>>> +void update_idle_cpumask(struct rq *rq, bool set_idle)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct sched_domain *sd;
>>>> + int cpu = cpu_of(rq);
>>>> + int idle_state;
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * If called from scheduler tick, only update
>>>> + * idle cpumask if the CPU is busy, as idle
>>>> + * cpumask is also updated on idle entry.
>>>> + *
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (!set_idle && idle_cpu(cpu))
>>>> + return;
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Also set SCHED_IDLE cpu in idle cpumask to
>>>> + * allow SCHED_IDLE cpu as a wakeup target
>>>> + */
>>>> + idle_state = set_idle || sched_idle_cpu(cpu);
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * No need to update idle cpumask if the state
>>>> + * does not change.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (rq->last_idle_state == idle_state)
>>>> + return;
>>>> +
>>>> + rcu_read_lock();
>>>> + sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc, cpu));
>>>> + if (!sd || !sd->shared)
>>>> + goto unlock;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (idle_state)
>>>> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, sds_idle_cpus(sd->shared));
>>>> + else
>>>> + cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, sds_idle_cpus(sd->shared));
>>>> +
>>>> + rq->last_idle_state = idle_state;
>>>> +unlock:
>>>> + rcu_read_unlock();
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> static unsigned long wakeup_gran(struct sched_entity *se)
>>>> {
>>>> unsigned long gran = sysctl_sched_wakeup_granularity;
>>>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle.c b/kernel/sched/idle.c
>>>> index f324dc36fc43..0bd83c00c22a 100644
>>>> --- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
>>>> +++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
>>>> @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static void cpuidle_idle_call(void)
>>>>
>>>> if (cpuidle_not_available(drv, dev)) {
>>>> tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick();
>>>> -
>>>> + update_idle_cpumask(this_rq(), true);
>>>> default_idle_call();
>>>> goto exit_idle;
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -205,9 +205,10 @@ static void cpuidle_idle_call(void)
>>>> */
>>>> next_state = cpuidle_select(drv, dev, &stop_tick);
>>>>
>>>> - if (stop_tick || tick_nohz_tick_stopped())
>>>> + if (stop_tick || tick_nohz_tick_stopped()) {
>>>> + update_idle_cpumask(this_rq(), true);
>>>> tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick();
>>>
>>> please keep same ordering here and above
>>> tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick();
>>> update_idle_cpumask(this_rq(), true);
>>
>> okay, will do, thanks!
>>
>>>
>>> Also, it might be good to call update_idle_cpumask everywhere
>>> tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick is called. For example S2Idle case should
>>> also set the mask
>>
>> Hmm, I did think about this, but not sure what's the point here to
>> set the mask when the whole system suspend to idle and all user space
>> are forzen?
>
> when system is in suspend to idle state, the cpu is idle. Would be
> good to set it in the mask so it can be used after the resume without
> waiting for an idle load balance to pull task if any
>
Okay, make sense, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists