[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201119121801.GA20115@lothringen>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 13:18:01 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 12/19] softirq: Add RT specific softirq accounting
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 03:02:19PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> RT requires the softirq to be preemptible and uses a per CPU local lock to
> protect BH disabled sections and softirq processing. Therefore RT cannot
> use the preempt counter to keep track of BH disabled/serving.
>
> Add a RT only counter to task struct and adjust the relevant macros in
> preempt.h.
You may want to describe a bit the reason for this per task counter.
It's not intuitive at this stage.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists