linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: bail out from psi memstall when cond

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201119125557.GM3121392@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 19 Nov 2020 13:55:57 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@...il.com>
Cc:     Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hannes@...xchg.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: bail out from psi memstall when cond_resched

On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 11:22:56AM +0800, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
> Memory reclaiming will run as several seconds in memory constraint system, which
> will be deemed as heavy memstall. Have the memory reclaim be more presiced by
> bailing out when cond_resched

How is this supposed to work on PREEMPT=y where cond_resched() is a NOP
and you can get preempted at any random point?

(leaving the rest for Johannes)
 
> Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>
> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index a815f73..a083c85 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -316,6 +316,15 @@ static inline bool memcg_congested(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +static inline void psi_cond_resched(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned long *flags;
> +
> +	if (current->flags & PF_MEMSTALL)
> +		psi_memstall_leave(&flags);
> +	cond_resched();
> +	psi_memstall_enter(&flags);
> +}
>  /*
>   * This misses isolated pages which are not accounted for to save counters.
>   * As the data only determines if reclaim or compaction continues, it is
> @@ -557,7 +566,7 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
>  		total_scan -= shrinkctl->nr_scanned;
>  		scanned += shrinkctl->nr_scanned;
>  
> -		cond_resched();
> +		psi_cond_resched();
>  	}
>  
>  	if (next_deferred >= scanned)
> @@ -714,7 +723,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
>  
>  	up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
>  out:
> -	cond_resched();
> +	psi_cond_resched();
>  	return freed;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1109,7 +1118,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
>  	unsigned nr_reclaimed = 0;
>  
>  	memset(stat, 0, sizeof(*stat));
> -	cond_resched();
> +	psi_cond_resched();
>  
>  	while (!list_empty(page_list)) {
>  		struct address_space *mapping;
> @@ -1118,7 +1127,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
>  		enum page_references references = PAGEREF_RECLAIM_CLEAN;
>  		bool dirty, writeback;
>  
> -		cond_resched();
> +		psi_cond_resched();
>  
>  		page = lru_to_page(page_list);
>  		list_del(&page->lru);
> @@ -2084,7 +2093,7 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
>  	spin_unlock_irq(&pgdat->lru_lock);
>  
>  	while (!list_empty(&l_hold)) {
> -		cond_resched();
> +		psi_cond_resched();
>  		page = lru_to_page(&l_hold);
>  		list_del(&page->lru);
>  
> @@ -2500,7 +2509,7 @@ static void shrink_node_memcg(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct mem_cgroup *memc
>  			}
>  		}
>  
> -		cond_resched();
> +		psi_cond_resched();
>  
>  		if (nr_reclaimed < nr_to_reclaim || scan_adjusted)
>  			continue;
> @@ -4149,7 +4158,7 @@ static int __node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned in
>  		.reclaim_idx = gfp_zone(gfp_mask),
>  	};
>  
> -	cond_resched();
> +	psi_cond_resched();
>  	fs_reclaim_acquire(sc.gfp_mask);
>  	/*
>  	 * We need to be able to allocate from the reserves for RECLAIM_UNMAP
> -- 
> 1.9.1
>