[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c2c7cd99-0e89-8d20-a8e9-42df49656c68@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 19:25:14 +0530
From: kajoljain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
acme@...nel.org
Cc: svens@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com, sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf test: Omit test 68 for s390.
On 11/4/20 1:59 PM, Thomas Richter wrote:
> Commit ed21d6d7c48e6e ("perf tests: Add test for PE binary format support")
> adds a WINDOWS EXE file named tests/pe-file.exe, which is
> examined by the test case 'PE file support'.
>
> This test reads the buildid from the file tests/pe-file.exe,
> which is a Portable Executable (PE) binary file used by the
> Windows operating system.
>
> Since s390 does not support PE files, omit this test.
>
> Output before:
> [root@...lp46 perf]# ./perf test -F 68
> 68: PE file support : Failed!
> [root@...lp46 perf]#
>
> Output after:
> [root@...lp46 perf]# ./perf test -F 68
> 68: PE file support : Skip
> [root@...lp46 perf]#
>
>
Patch looks good to me. Thanks for correcting it. Since in powerpc also we are having similar issue,
I send patch on top of this change.
Reviewed-By: Kajol Jain<kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
Thanks,
Kajol Jain
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/pe-file-parsing.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/pe-file-parsing.c b/tools/perf/tests/pe-file-parsing.c
> index 58b90c42eb38..4e45178c50f6 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/pe-file-parsing.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/pe-file-parsing.c
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
>
> #include "tests.h"
>
> -#ifdef HAVE_LIBBFD_SUPPORT
> +#if defined(HAVE_LIBBFD_SUPPORT) && !defined(__s390x__)
>
> static int run_dir(const char *d)
> {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists