lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 19 Nov 2020 08:59:02 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
        Chen Yu <yu.chen.surf@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] tools/bootconfig: Fix to check the write failure
 correctly

On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:41:09 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:

> > If the first write fails (doesn't modify the initrd), and then this fails,
> > you will show a message of: "may be corrupted. Recommend to rebuild", when
> > that would not be the case. Should a test of the size be done again, to see
> > if it is already the same?  
> 
> Please see the above 2 write error check. You can find
> 
> if (ret < 0)
> 	goto out;
> 
> only in the first check. (I know, it might a bit misleadable)
> So, the first write is failed with error message, it doesn't call rollback.

Ah right, I missed check within the error check. I was only looking at the
first error and the goto at the end.

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ