lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 19 Nov 2020 22:32:37 +0800
From:   Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nivedita@...m.mit.edu,
        thomas.lendacky@....com, yazen.ghannam@....com, wei.huang2@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] tools/x86: add kcpuid tool to show raw CPU
 features

On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 03:15:12PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 09:50:10PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> > That's really odd. I tried on 3 baremetal machines: one Skylake NUC device,
> > one Xeon E5-2699 and one Xeon E5-2680.
> 
> Ah, sorry, not virt, virt is 0x4000_0000. Yeah, I remember now. It is
> function 4 which AMD doesn't implement and I'm running this on AMD:

Great! That's the trick :) I will be more careful with these special ranges
from different vendors.   

Thanks,
Feng

> $ cpuid -1r
> CPU:
>    0x00000000 0x00: eax=0x0000000d ebx=0x68747541 ecx=0x444d4163 edx=0x69746e65
>    0x00000001 0x00: eax=0x00800f82 ebx=0x0c100800 ecx=0x7ed8320b edx=0x178bfbff
>    0x00000002 0x00: eax=0x00000000 ebx=0x00000000 ecx=0x00000000 edx=0x00000000
>    0x00000003 0x00: eax=0x00000000 ebx=0x00000000 ecx=0x00000000 edx=0x00000000
> 
> <-- no function 4.
> 
>    0x00000005 0x00: eax=0x00000040 ebx=0x00000040 ecx=0x00000003 edx=0x00000011
>    ...
> 
> That's why.  :-)
> 
> Btw, there are other funny ranges on Intel:
> 
> ./cpuid -1r
> CPU:
>    0x20000000 0x00: eax=0x00000000 ebx=0x00000001 ecx=0x00000001 edx=0x00000000
> 
> That one has 2 bits set.
> 
>    0x80860000 0x00: eax=0x00000000 ebx=0x00000001 ecx=0x00000001 edx=0x00000000
>    0xc0000000 0x00: eax=0x00000000 ebx=0x00000001 ecx=0x00000001 edx=0x00000000
> 
> And those too.
> 
> Fun.
> 
> -- 
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
> 
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ