linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] dt-bindings: arm: add support for SCMI Regulators

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201119152719.pkba7bz23s4bzo46@bogus>
Date:   Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:27:19 +0000
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, lukasz.luba@....com,
        Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, broonie@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
        satyakim@....qualcomm.com, etienne.carriere@...aro.org,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        souvik.chakravarty@....com, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] dt-bindings: arm: add support for SCMI Regulators

On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 12:34:15PM +0000, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Add devicetree bindings to support regulators based on SCMI Voltage
> Domain Protocol.
>

Ideally, the DT binding should be first one, rather before the binding
is used in the code. I can move the order while applying.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep