lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 20:42:45 +0100 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/38] ASoC: ak5558: drop of_match_ptr from of_device_id table On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 04:56:34PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 05:16:15PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > The driver can match only via the DT table so the table should be always > > used and the of_match_ptr does not have any sense (this also allows ACPI > > matching via PRP0001, even though it is not relevant here). This fixes > > compile warning (!CONFIG_OF on x86_64): > > It would be better to fix these by annotating the table as potentially > unused, if nothing else it means if someone wants to add ACPI support > (or it just works on their ACPI system with the plain old I2C ID) then > they don't need to revert this change. The point is after this patch - removal of of_match_ptr() - they will already support the ACPI matching through the PRP0001. Keeping of_match_ptr() and maybe_unused will prevent any ACPI re-usage unless explicit ACPI table is added Best regards, Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists