lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 20 Nov 2020 14:35:35 -0800
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc:     linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ide/Falcon: Remove in_interrupt() usage.

On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 10:24:20 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:

> falconide_get_lock() is called by ide_lock_host() and its caller
> (ide_issue_rq()) has already a might_sleep() check.
> 
> stdma_lock() has wait_event() which also has a might_sleep() check.
> 
> Remove the in_interrupt() check.
> 
> ...
>
> --- a/drivers/ide/falconide.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/falconide.c
> @@ -51,8 +51,6 @@ static void falconide_release_lock(void)
>  static void falconide_get_lock(irq_handler_t handler, void *data)
>  {
>  	if (falconide_intr_lock == 0) {
> -		if (in_interrupt() > 0)
> -			panic("Falcon IDE hasn't ST-DMA lock in interrupt");
>  		stdma_lock(handler, data);
>  		falconide_intr_lock = 1;
>  	}

The current mainline falconide_get_lock() is very different:

static void falconide_release_lock(void)
{
	if (falconide_intr_lock == 0) {
		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bug\n", __func__);
		return;
	}
	falconide_intr_lock = 0;
	stdma_release();
}

Powered by blists - more mailing lists