linux-kernel - Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v5 11/21] mm/hugetlb: Allocate the vmemmap pages associated with each hugetlb page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:51:59 +0800
From:   Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, paulmck@...nel.org,
        mchehab+huawei@...nel.org, pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, oneukum@...e.com,
        anshuman.khandual@....com, jroedel@...e.de,
        Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        "Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
        Xiongchun duan <duanxiongchun@...edance.com>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v5 11/21] mm/hugetlb: Allocate the vmemmap
 pages associated with each hugetlb page

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 4:11 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri 20-11-20 14:43:15, Muchun Song wrote:
> [...]
> > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
> > index eda7e3a0b67c..361c4174e222 100644
> > --- a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
> > +++ b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
> > @@ -117,6 +117,8 @@
> >  #define RESERVE_VMEMMAP_NR           2U
> >  #define RESERVE_VMEMMAP_SIZE         (RESERVE_VMEMMAP_NR << PAGE_SHIFT)
> >  #define TAIL_PAGE_REUSE                      -1
> > +#define GFP_VMEMMAP_PAGE             \
> > +     (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL | __GFP_MEMALLOC)
>
> This is really dangerous! __GFP_MEMALLOC would allow a complete memory
> depletion. I am not even sure triggering the OOM killer is a reasonable
> behavior. It is just unexpected that shrinking a hugetlb pool can have
> destructive side effects. I believe it would be more reasonable to
> simply refuse to shrink the pool if we cannot free those pages up. This
> sucks as well but it isn't destructive at least.

I find the instructions of __GFP_MEMALLOC from the kernel doc.

%__GFP_MEMALLOC allows access to all memory. This should only be used when
the caller guarantees the allocation will allow more memory to be freed
very shortly.

Our situation is in line with the description above. We will free a HugeTLB page
to the buddy allocator which is much larger than that we allocated shortly.

Thanks.

> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs



-- 
Yours,
Muchun