lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 20 Nov 2020 10:18:27 +0100
From:   Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
To:     Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Cc:     DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Pawel Osciak <pawel@...iak.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
        Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/17] media/videbuf1|2: Mark follow_pfn usage as unsafe

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 9:28 AM Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl> wrote:
>
> On 20/11/2020 09:06, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On 19/11/2020 15:41, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> The media model assumes that buffers are all preallocated, so that
> >> when a media pipeline is running we never miss a deadline because the
> >> buffers aren't allocated or available.
> >>
> >> This means we cannot fix the v4l follow_pfn usage through
> >> mmu_notifier, without breaking how this all works. The only real fix
> >> is to deprecate userptr support for VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP mappings and
> >> tell everyone to cut over to dma-buf memory sharing for zerocopy.
> >>
> >> userptr for normal memory will keep working as-is, this only affects
> >> the zerocopy userptr usage enabled in 50ac952d2263 ("[media]
> >> videobuf2-dma-sg: Support io userptr operations on io memory").
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
> >
> > Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>
>
> Actually, cancel this Acked-by.
>
> So let me see if I understand this right: VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP mappings can
> move around. There is a mmu_notifier that can be used to be notified when
> that happens, but that can't be used with media buffers since those buffers
> must always be available and in the same place.
>
> So follow_pfn is replaced by unsafe_follow_pfn to signal that what is attempted
> is unsafe and unreliable.
>
> If CONFIG_STRICT_FOLLOW_PFN is set, then unsafe_follow_pfn will fail, if it
> is unset, then it writes a warning to the kernel log but just continues while
> still unsafe.
>
> I am very much inclined to just drop VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP support in the media
> subsystem. For vb2 there is a working alternative in the form of dmabuf, and
> frankly for vb1 I don't care. If someone really needs this for a vb1 driver,
> then they can do the work to convert that driver to vb2.
>
> I've added Mauro to the CC list and I'll ping a few more people to see what
> they think, but in my opinion support for USERPTR + VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP
> should just be killed off.
>
> If others would like to keep it, then frame_vector.c needs a comment before
> the 'while' explaining why the unsafe_follow_pfn is there and that using
> dmabuf is the proper alternative to use. That will make it easier for
> developers to figure out why they see a kernel warning and what to do to
> fix it, rather than having to dig through the git history for the reason.

I'm happy to add a comment, but otherwise if you all want to ditch
this, can we do this as a follow up on top? There's quite a bit of
code that can be deleted and I'd like to not hold up this patch set
here on that - it's already a fairly sprawling pain touching about 7
different subsystems (ok only 6-ish now since the s390 patch landed).
For the comment, is the explanation next to unsafe_follow_pfn not good
enough?

So ... can I get you to un-cancel your ack?

Thanks, Daniel

>
> Regards,
>
>         Hans
>
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >       Hans
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
> >> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
> >> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> >> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> >> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> >> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
> >> Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
> >> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> >> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> >> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
> >> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> >> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
> >> Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org
> >> Cc: Pawel Osciak <pawel@...iak.com>
> >> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> >> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
> >> Cc: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
> >> Cc: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>
> >> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> >> Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
> >> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
> >> --
> >> v3:
> >> - Reference the commit that enabled the zerocopy userptr use case to
> >>   make it abundandtly clear that this patch only affects that, and not
> >>   normal memory userptr. The old commit message already explained that
> >>   normal memory userptr is unaffected, but I guess that was not clear
> >>   enough.
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/media/common/videobuf2/frame_vector.c | 2 +-
> >>  drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-dma-contig.c | 2 +-
> >>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/frame_vector.c b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/frame_vector.c
> >> index a0e65481a201..1a82ec13ea00 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/frame_vector.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/frame_vector.c
> >> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ int get_vaddr_frames(unsigned long start, unsigned int nr_frames,
> >>                      break;
> >>
> >>              while (ret < nr_frames && start + PAGE_SIZE <= vma->vm_end) {
> >> -                    err = follow_pfn(vma, start, &nums[ret]);
> >> +                    err = unsafe_follow_pfn(vma, start, &nums[ret]);
> >>                      if (err) {
> >>                              if (ret == 0)
> >>                                      ret = err;
> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-dma-contig.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-dma-contig.c
> >> index 52312ce2ba05..821c4a76ab96 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-dma-contig.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-dma-contig.c
> >> @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static int videobuf_dma_contig_user_get(struct videobuf_dma_contig_memory *mem,
> >>      user_address = untagged_baddr;
> >>
> >>      while (pages_done < (mem->size >> PAGE_SHIFT)) {
> >> -            ret = follow_pfn(vma, user_address, &this_pfn);
> >> +            ret = unsafe_follow_pfn(vma, user_address, &this_pfn);
> >>              if (ret)
> >>                      break;
> >>
> >>
> >
>


-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

Powered by blists - more mailing lists