[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d2148d19-b8b3-1492-701b-3a85b761fd76@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:05:17 +0100
From: Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, luto@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Deep Shah <sdeep@...are.com>,
"VMware, Inc." <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] x86: rework arch_local_irq_restore() to not use
popf
On 20.11.20 12:59, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 12:46:23PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> +static __always_inline void arch_local_irq_restore(unsigned long flags)
>> +{
>> + if (!arch_irqs_disabled_flags(flags))
>> + arch_local_irq_enable();
>> +}
>
> If someone were to write horrible code like:
>
> local_irq_disable();
> local_irq_save(flags);
> local_irq_enable();
> local_irq_restore(flags);
>
> we'd be up some creek without a paddle... now I don't _think_ we have
> genius code like that, but I'd feel saver if we can haz an assertion in
> there somewhere...
>
> Maybe something like:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY // for lack of something saner
> WARN_ON_ONCE((arch_local_save_flags() ^ flags) & X86_EFLAGS_IF);
> #endif
>
> At the end?
>
I'd be fine with that. I didn't add something like that because I
couldn't find a suitable CONFIG_ :-)
Juergen
Download attachment "OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (3092 bytes)
Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature" of type "application/pgp-signature" (496 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists