linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Revisit NUMA imbalance tolerance and fork balancing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201120125811.GJ3021@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:58:11 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Revisit NUMA imbalance tolerance and fork
 balancing

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 09:06:26AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:

> Mel Gorman (4):
>   sched/numa: Rename nr_running and break out the magic number
>   sched: Avoid unnecessary calculation of load imbalance at clone time
>   sched/numa: Allow a floating imbalance between NUMA nodes
>   sched: Limit the amount of NUMA imbalance that can exist at fork time
> 
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

OK, lets give this another go :-)

Thanks!