| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20201121144739.338dadb3@archlinux>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 14:47:39 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>,
linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
groeck@...omium.org,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] iio: cros_ec: use
devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup_ext()
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:35:16 +0200
Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 6:40 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 17:31:55 +0300
> > Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:09 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:55 PM Alexandru Ardelean
> > > > <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > This change switches to the new devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup_ext()
> > > > > function and removes the iio_buffer_set_attrs() call, for assigning the
> > > > > HW FIFO attributes to the buffer.
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, you were too fast with the version, below one nit.
> > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > .../common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c | 15 +++++++++------
> > > > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> > > > > index c62cacc04672..1eafcf04ad69 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> > > > > @@ -353,19 +353,22 @@ int cros_ec_sensors_core_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > > > > if (ret)
> > > > > return ret;
> > > > > } else {
> > > > > + const struct attribute **fifo_attrs;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (has_hw_fifo)
> > > > > + fifo_attrs = cros_ec_sensor_fifo_attributes;
> > > > > + else
> > > > > + fifo_attrs = NULL;
> > > > > +
> > > > > /*
> > > > > * The only way to get samples in buffer is to set a
> > > > > * software trigger (systrig, hrtimer).
> > > > > */
> > > > > - ret = devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup(
> > > >
> > > > > + ret = devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup_ext(
> > > > > dev, indio_dev, NULL, trigger_capture,
> > > > > - NULL);
> > > > > + NULL, fifo_attrs);
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps it's time to reformat a bit, i.e. move dev to the first line
> > > > and do the rest accordingly?
> > >
> > > this feels like a mix of preferences here;
> > > for once, the patch here [as-is], is the minimal form for this change
> > > [in terms of patch-noise];
> > > so, some people would choose the least noisiest patch;
> > >
> > > also, this indentation was chosen [as-is here] from the start [for
> > > this code block];
> > > not sure if it was preferred; i'd suspect it was due to the old 80-col limit;
> > >
> > > i'd leave it as-is [for now], or defer the decision to a maintainer to
> > > decide [either IIO or chromium];
> >
> > The indenting of this whole code block is a bit too deep.
> >
> > Looks to me like we should flip the sense of the outer if statement
> >
> > if (!physical_device)
> > return 0;
> >
> > That would lead to a whole bunch of reformatting around here including
> > picking up this.
> >
> > For now I can just shuffle it a bit whilst applying.
> >
> > This set isn't likely to make the merge window anyway now as I'd like
> > it to sit on list a little longer just because it touches several
> > drivers with active maintainers and I'd like time for them to sanity
> > check.
> >
>
> ping on this;
> should i do a V4 for this?
Yes, probably worth sending out again. I'd like to see a few more acks
on the individual drivers ideally and a v4 will get this to the
top of peoples' inboxes.
If we don't get them I won't let it block this series, but it's nice
to try at least!
Thanks,
Jonathan
>
> this is related to the multiple IIO buffer support:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20201117162340.43924-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com/T/#t
>
> it's one of the patchsets i could split away on it's own;
>
> > Jonathan
> >
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > if (ret)
> > > > > return ret;
> > > > > -
> > > > > - if (has_hw_fifo)
> > > > > - iio_buffer_set_attrs(indio_dev->buffer,
> > > > > - cros_ec_sensor_fifo_attributes);
> > > > > }
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.17.1
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > With Best Regards,
> > > > Andy Shevchenko
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists