| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20201121170519.GA2343@thinkpad>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 22:35:19 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, hemantk@...eaurora.org,
jhugo@...eaurora.org, loic.poulain@...aro.org,
kvalo@...eaurora.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] bus: mhi: core: Add support to stop or start
channel data transfers
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 12:56:16PM -0800, Bhaumik Bhatt wrote:
> Hi Mani,
>
> On 2020-11-16 04:43, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 11:21:10AM -0800, Bhaumik Bhatt wrote:
> > > Some MHI client drivers may want to request a pause or halt of
> > > data transfer activity on their channels. Support for this does
> > > not exist and must be introduced, wherein the channel context is
> > > not reset or cleared but only the STOP channel command is issued.
> > > This would need to be paired with an API that allows resuming the
> > > data transfer activity on channels by use of the START channel
> > > command. This API assumes that the context information is already
> > > setup. Enable this using two new APIs, mhi_start_transfer() and
> > > mhi_stop_transfer().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@...eaurora.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c | 41
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/linux/mhi.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c
> > > index 1226933..1a969f4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c
> > > @@ -1560,6 +1560,47 @@ void mhi_unprepare_from_transfer(struct
> > > mhi_device *mhi_dev)
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mhi_unprepare_from_transfer);
> > >
> > > +static int mhi_update_transfer_state(struct mhi_device *mhi_dev,
> > > + enum mhi_ch_state_type to_state)
> > > +{
> > > + struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl = mhi_dev->mhi_cntrl;
> > > + struct mhi_chan *mhi_chan;
> > > + int dir, ret;
> > > +
> > > + for (dir = 0; dir < 2; dir++) {
> > > + mhi_chan = dir ? mhi_dev->ul_chan : mhi_dev->dl_chan;
> > > +
> > > + if (!mhi_chan)
> > > + continue;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Bail out if one of the channels fail as client will reset
> > > + * both upon failure
> > > + */
> > > + mutex_lock(&mhi_chan->mutex);
> >
> > Hmm. The documentation about wait_for_completion*() used in
> > mhi_update_channel_state()says below,
> >
> > "As all variants of wait_for_completion() can (obviously) block for a
> > long
> > time depending on the nature of the activity they are waiting for, so in
> > most cases you probably don't want to call this with held mutexes."
> >
> Yes, that is understood. The mhi_chan->mutex is only used to lock any
> channel
> enable/start/stop/disable type operations, since these have to be in order,
> it
> is essential that we wait for one of the operations to finish before the
> next
> one.
>
> Also we avoid a race, for example, at a time when a device crash forces a
> driver
> "remove" call, while an operation to start/stop a channel is already going
> on.
Can't you just drop the lock before calling wait_for_completion() and
acquire later? You should add a comment for that also!
> > > + ret = mhi_update_channel_state(mhi_cntrl, mhi_chan, to_state);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + mutex_unlock(&mhi_chan->mutex);
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > + mutex_unlock(&mhi_chan->mutex);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int mhi_stop_transfer(struct mhi_device *mhi_dev)
> > > +{
> > > + return mhi_update_transfer_state(mhi_dev, MHI_CH_STATE_TYPE_STOP);
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mhi_stop_transfer);
> > > +
> > > +int mhi_start_transfer(struct mhi_device *mhi_dev)
> > > +{
> > > + return mhi_update_transfer_state(mhi_dev, MHI_CH_STATE_TYPE_START);
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mhi_start_transfer);
> > > +
> > > int mhi_poll(struct mhi_device *mhi_dev, u32 budget)
> > > {
> > > struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl = mhi_dev->mhi_cntrl;
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/mhi.h b/include/linux/mhi.h
> > > index 52b3c60..aee8494 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/mhi.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/mhi.h
> > > @@ -702,6 +702,25 @@ int mhi_prepare_for_transfer(struct mhi_device
> > > *mhi_dev);
> > > void mhi_unprepare_from_transfer(struct mhi_device *mhi_dev);
> > >
> > > /**
> > > + * mhi_stop_transfer - Pauses ongoing channel activity by issuing
> > > the STOP
> > > + * channel command to both UL and DL channels.
> > > This command
> > > + * does not reset the channel context and the
> > > client drivers
> > > + * can issue mhi_start_transfer to resume
> > > activity.
> > > + * @mhi_dev: Device associated with the channels
> > > + */
> > > +int mhi_stop_transfer(struct mhi_device *mhi_dev);
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * mhi_start_transfer - Resumes channel activity by issuing the
> > > START channel
> > > + * command to both UL and DL channels. This
> > > command assumes
> > > + * the channel context is already setup and
> > > the client
> > > + * drivers can issue mhi_stop_transfer to
> > > pause activity if
> > > + * required.
> > > + * @mhi_dev: Device associated with the channels
> > > + */
> > > +int mhi_start_transfer(struct mhi_device *mhi_dev);
> > > +
> > > +/**
> >
> > Align the comment header properly.
> >
> So I am trying to follow the documentation style for other functions in the
> same
> file. Is there any particular format you want me to refer to?
>
> I use all spaces for the lines after the first one to align them just like
> the
> rest of them.
>
The diff shows me of below style:
/**
+ *
+ *
...
+ /**
I just asked to fix this.
Thanks,
Mani
> > Thanks,
> > Mani
> >
> > > * mhi_poll - Poll for any available data in DL direction
> > > * @mhi_dev: Device associated with the channels
> > > * @budget: # of events to process
> > > --
> > > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
> > > Forum,
> > > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
> > >
>
> Thanks,
> Bhaumik
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists