linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] arm64: dts: sdm845: add oneplus 6/t devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201121174442.GA12057@duo.ucw.cz>
Date:   Sat, 21 Nov 2020 18:44:42 +0100
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Caleb Connolly <caleb@...nolly.tech>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
        Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] arm64: dts: sdm845: add oneplus 6/t devices

On Mon 2020-11-16 23:49:32, Caleb Connolly wrote:
> On 2020-11-16 22:01, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >> Add initial support for the OnePlus 6 (enchilada) and 6T (fajita) based
> >> on the sdm845-mtp DT. Support includes:
> >>
> >> * Display panels and Adreno 630
> >> * Touch screen support with synaptics rmi4
> >> * All remoteprocs start correctly
> >> * WLAN / Bluetooth
> >> * Volume / power buttons and OnePlus Tri-State switch are functional
> >>      The tri-state switch is a 3 state mute slider on the side of the phone * USB
> >> support, currently forced to peripheral as type C detection isn't functional.
> > I have similar switches on my joystick... but I don't believe modelling it as 3 separate
> > keys with "macro" keysym is the right way to go.
> 
> Hi! I agree that this is a bit of a weird way to model the switch, do 
> you have any ideas for a better solution?

You should ask on the input mailing list, I guess.

Best regards,
									Pavel
-- 
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)