[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201121185243.255d33b2@archlinux>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 18:52:43 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
Cc: <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<lars@...afoo.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/12] iio: core,buffer: add support for multiple
IIO buffers per IIO device
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 18:23:28 +0200
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com> wrote:
> Continuing from:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20200517144023.6c5cb169@archlinux/
>
> This is a V2 of the initial attempt in the discussion above.
> But it did not occur to me that I should mark it as V2 when I generated
> the patches.
> I've only tested [so far] that the current IIO buffer mechnism still works.
> And decided to show this sketch patchset.
>
> This requires the ioctl() centralization mechanism, for which I sent a
> fix earlier.
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/CA+U=Dsqf3UgyM666Gg9EmehpWiucDx2P0bmsC9JR--JJDT_eWQ@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20201117095154.7189-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com/T/#u
>
> The gist of this is that now, the first IIO buffer should work as
> before, but all extra buffers should go through the anon inodes
> mechanism.
> I'd need to find a device or a way or a chip to test these extra buffers
> stuff. But I'm confident that this current form should eventually work
> with multiple IIO buffers per 1 IIO device and with anon inodes.
>
> Maybe I'll take some of the patches in this set separately and send them
> individually. The problem with patchsets like this that tackle changes
> in a framework (like IIO) is that I become unsure after the 5th-7th patch,
> that the approach is correct. And I get even more unsure after that.
>
> I'll create some userspace code to test this a bit, but I thought I'd
> send an RFC in the meantime.
From a first read, with all the warnings you give above, this looks pretty
good to me. The kobj stuff is a little nasty and needs more docs
but other than that it all looks quite pleasant and readable and was
roughly what I was expecting from earlier discussions (which is great!).
Good work on this, looking forward to next steps.
Jonathan
>
> Alexandru Ardelean (12):
> iio: core: register chardev only if needed
> iio: buffer: add back-ref from iio_buffer to iio_dev
> iio: buffer: rework buffer & scan_elements dir creation
> iio: buffer: add index to the first IIO buffer dir and symlink it back
> iio: core: split __iio_device_attr_init() to init only the attr object
> iio: buffer: re-route scan_elements via it's kobj_type
> iio: buffer: re-route core buffer attributes via it's new kobj_type
> iio: buffer: add helper to get the IIO device to which a buffer
> belongs
> iio: re-route all buffer attributes through new buffer kobj_type
> iio: core: wrap iio device & buffer into struct for character devices
> iio: buffer: introduce support for attaching more IIO buffers
> iio: buffer: add ioctl() to support opening extra buffers for IIO
> device
>
> drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c | 36 +-
> drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-core.c | 34 +-
> drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c | 30 +-
> .../buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c | 13 +-
> .../cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c | 30 +-
> .../common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-trigger.c | 32 +-
> drivers/iio/iio_core.h | 11 +
> drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 582 ++++++++++++++----
> drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c | 117 ++--
> include/linux/iio/buffer.h | 2 +
> include/linux/iio/buffer_impl.h | 25 +-
> include/linux/iio/iio-opaque.h | 6 +
> include/linux/iio/iio.h | 2 +-
> include/linux/iio/sysfs.h | 50 ++
> include/uapi/linux/iio/buffer.h | 16 +
> 15 files changed, 735 insertions(+), 251 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/iio/buffer.h
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists