lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 22 Nov 2020 00:04:36 +0100
From:   Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 072/141] can: peak_usb: Fix fall-through warnings for
 Clang

On 11/21/20 8:50 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> What about moving the default to the end if the case, which is more common anyways:
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/usb/peak_usb/pcan_usb_core.c b/drivers/net/can/usb/peak_usb/pcan_usb_core.c
> []
>> @@ -295,16 +295,16 @@ static void peak_usb_write_bulk_callback(struct urb *urb)
>>                 netif_trans_update(netdev);
>>                 break;
>>  
>>
>> -       default:
>> -               if (net_ratelimit())
>> -                       netdev_err(netdev, "Tx urb aborted (%d)\n",
>> -                                  urb->status);
>>         case -EPROTO:
>>         case -ENOENT:
>>         case -ECONNRESET:
>>         case -ESHUTDOWN:
>> -
>>                 break;
>> +
>> +       default:
>> +               if (net_ratelimit())
>> +                       netdev_err(netdev, "Tx urb aborted (%d)\n",
>> +                                  urb->status);
> 
> That's fine and is more generally used style but this
> default: case should IMO also end with a break;
> 
> +		break;

I don't mind.

process/coding-style.rst is not totally clear about the break after the default,
if this is the lase one the switch statement.

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ