[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21890103-fce2-bb50-7fc2-6c6d509b982f@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:58:09 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: XiaoLi Feng <xifeng@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ira.weiny@...el.com, darrick.wong@...cle.com
Cc: Xiaoli Feng <fengxiaoli0714@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/stat: set attributes_mask for STATX_ATTR_DAX
Hi,
I don't know this code, but:
On 11/20/20 4:33 PM, XiaoLi Feng wrote:
> From: Xiaoli Feng <fengxiaoli0714@...il.com>
>
> keep attributes and attributes_mask are consistent for
> STATX_ATTR_DAX.
> ---
> fs/stat.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/stat.c b/fs/stat.c
> index dacecdda2e79..914a61d256b0 100644
> --- a/fs/stat.c
> +++ b/fs/stat.c
> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ int vfs_getattr_nosec(const struct path *path, struct kstat *stat,
>
> if (IS_DAX(inode))
> stat->attributes |= STATX_ATTR_DAX;
> -
> + stat->attributes_mask |= STATX_ATTR_DAX;
Why shouldn't that be:
if (IS_DAX(inode))
stat->attributes_mask |= STATX_ATTR_DAX;
or combine them, like this:
if (IS_DAX(inode)) {
stat->attributes |= STATX_ATTR_DAX;
stat->attributes_mask |= STATX_ATTR_DAX;
}
and no need to delete that blank line.
> if (inode->i_op->getattr)
> return inode->i_op->getattr(path, stat, request_mask,
> query_flags);
>
thanks.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists