[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21890103-fce2-bb50-7fc2-6c6d509b982f@infradead.org>
Date:   Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:58:09 -0800
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     XiaoLi Feng <xifeng@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ira.weiny@...el.com, darrick.wong@...cle.com
Cc:     Xiaoli Feng <fengxiaoli0714@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/stat: set attributes_mask for STATX_ATTR_DAX
Hi,
I don't know this code, but:
On 11/20/20 4:33 PM, XiaoLi Feng wrote:
> From: Xiaoli Feng <fengxiaoli0714@...il.com>
> 
> keep attributes and attributes_mask are consistent for
> STATX_ATTR_DAX.
> ---
>  fs/stat.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/stat.c b/fs/stat.c
> index dacecdda2e79..914a61d256b0 100644
> --- a/fs/stat.c
> +++ b/fs/stat.c
> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ int vfs_getattr_nosec(const struct path *path, struct kstat *stat,
>  
>  	if (IS_DAX(inode))
>  		stat->attributes |= STATX_ATTR_DAX;
> -
> +	stat->attributes_mask |= STATX_ATTR_DAX;
Why shouldn't that be:
	if (IS_DAX(inode))
		stat->attributes_mask |= STATX_ATTR_DAX;
or combine them, like this:
	if (IS_DAX(inode)) {
		stat->attributes |= STATX_ATTR_DAX;
		stat->attributes_mask |= STATX_ATTR_DAX;
	}
and no need to delete that blank line.
>  	if (inode->i_op->getattr)
>  		return inode->i_op->getattr(path, stat, request_mask,
>  					    query_flags);
> 
thanks.
-- 
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
