lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201122105813.GA3780@kozik-lap>
Date:   Sun, 22 Nov 2020 11:59:20 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/38] ASoC: ak5558: drop of_match_ptr from of_device_id
 table

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 08:04:29PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 08:42:45PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 04:56:34PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > It would be better to fix these by annotating the table as potentially
> > > unused, if nothing else it means if someone wants to add ACPI support
> > > (or it just works on their ACPI system with the plain old I2C ID) then
> > > they don't need to revert this change.
> 
> > The point is after this patch - removal of of_match_ptr() - they will
> > already support the ACPI matching through the PRP0001.
> 
> > Keeping of_match_ptr() and maybe_unused will prevent any ACPI re-usage
> > unless explicit ACPI table is added
> 
> Surely if that's the desired outcome the fix is to change the definition
> of of_match_ptr() such that it leaves the reference with CONFIG_ACPI,
> perhaps hidden behind a config option for PRP0001?  That seems better
> than going through the entire tree like this.

That could be indeed an easier way to achieve this.

+Cc Andy, Rafael,

I saw you were doing similar way as I did here [1] for the 698fffc2705c
("rtc: ds1307: Drop of_match_ptr and CONFIG_OF protections") with the
same reasoning as mine ("These prevent use of this driver with ACPI via
PRP0001.").

Do you have thoughts on Mark's proposal above (to change the
of_match_ptr())?

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201120161653.445521-1-krzk@kernel.org/

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ